The latest questionnaire consisted of step three bits. Area I provided concerns off socio-market studies (ages, amount of training, parity, familial earnings, community, newest marital updates, sexual hobby, history of HPV vaccination, and you will history of irregular cervical cancers testing).
Region II comprised of 6 questions relating to the target ladies who are going to be screened, decades to start, frequency, decades otherwise conditions to avoid from screening, and techniques from assessment. Just the people who had ever heard regarding HPV carry out go-ahead to Area III and therefore examined knowledge about HPV away from their sort of (oncogenic or non-oncogenic), form off signal and you may protection.
Before the study, this new survey away from region II and region III within the Thai type was indeed considered, talked about, and revised up until consensus certainly one of 20 researchers have been the gynecologic oncologists (some have been article authors in other parallel knowledge). The professionals ranked each one of 19 issues as the often ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘perhaps not relevant’. The item-top Stuff Authenticity Directory (I-CVI) is actually computed per item, and also the Blogs Validity List (CVI) is calculated by using the typical ratio of 14 questions about information about cervical disease evaluating and you can 5 questions relating to HPV. Brand new CVI was step one for components of new questionnaire (S1 Desk). The latest accuracy is actually checked-out when you look at the 30 women with the same attribute given that people. The fresh Cronbach’ leader coefficients to the precision had been 0.819 to have understanding of cervical malignant tumors examination and you can 0.907 having information about HPV.
Research collection
Towards the day away from scheduled colposcopy, the study secretary considering recommendations of slavisk brudebureau analysis towards the female just who satisfied addition standards. The ladies exactly who accessible to participate provided authored advised concur and you will replied the fresh new questionnaire by themselves by themselves ahead of proceeding so you can colposcopy.
Analysis collected because of it study were socio-group analysis (Part We of your questionnaire), expertise in cervical disease assessment (Area II), and you can knowledge of HPV (Part III).
Analytical data
New responses of knowledge regarding the cervical disease assessment and HPV was in fact reviewed of the for each and every items just before scoring categorization. Best respond to are scored as 1 whereas ‘completely wrong and you can unsure answer’ try obtained 0.
Regarding fourteen concerns from cervical cancer testing, women whose score were ? 10 was arbitrarily categorized as the having ‘an effective knowledge’ if not was basically regarded as that have “negative degree”. To possess experience with HPV, women whoever address try ‘never ever heard of HPV’ were omitted on data from HPV training.
Of 5 inquiries, feminine whoever score was indeed ? 3 was basically considered as which have ‘a good knowledge of HPV’ usually because the ‘bad knowledge’. From 19 inquiries, women whose get had been ? thirteen was classified as the having ‘an excellent complete knowledge’ usually because ‘not good full knowledge’.
Most of the study was collected inside the an electronic digital databases and you may assessed using SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were utilized to analyze group research and you can was in fact described since the quantity with fee, mean having simple deviation otherwise average having diversity. The fresh new association anywhere between for every single changeable and you can education get was basically analyzed playing with effortless linear regression. Exploratory design was developed in the multivariable data plus all the details possibly regarding the information and knowledge rating. The new believed number of statistical benefit try a good p-value of 0.05 otherwise smaller.
Efficiency
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>