, 2015; Cardoso and Souza, 2016; Santiago and you may Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you can Jalalzai, 2021). Contained in this works we shall work on misogyny because the acquiesced by all of our interviewees relating to Rousseff’s six years in the strength, specifically emphasizing the relationship between misogynistic backlash while the gendered double join character known. On after the section we offer a very nuanced definition to possess all the subcategories identified (see Dining table 2), taking remain-alone significance and you can advice throughout the analysis in conjunction with detailed analyses away from trick minutes for the Rousseff’s presidency one exemplify new dynamic ranging from our nuanced suggestion getting analyzing the new gendered double join, misogynist backlash, and its particular consequence towards the Rousseff’s presidency.
The brand new four subcategories understood starred in the information within different accounts (select Dining tables step three, 4). One or two templates starred in higher ratio: Review to Guys and you will Misogynyments themed given that testing so you’re able to guys seemed from inside the almost 50 % of the interview and represented 36 percent regarding most of the comments codifiedments inspired as the misogyny had been the vast majority of comments (38 %) and you will appeared in 44 percent of all of the interview. This means, interviewees were most aware regarding Rousseff’s character since the chairman compared for other men political figures and you may former presidents, and the implies Rousseff is actually punished during the her management on account of gendered presumption and you can backlash.
When you’re lookin having smaller regularity throughout the interview, one other a few themes offer important context in order to knowledge possible sexist backlash during the presidency regarding Brazil’s first woman president. Conversations about Rousseff tried to comply with gendered requirement ascribed so you can female (Conforming toward Double Join) starred in more 10% of opinion coded and you can interviews conducted. At the same time, discussion about how precisely Rousseff challenged the new gendered hopes of their particular reputation (Problematic the newest Twice Join) appeared in more than that fifth of the many interview, constituting 16 per cent of all statements coded.
The newest dysfunction of numerical occurrence of one’s thematic investigation will bring a starting point to help you a qualitative investigation of every motif sexiga Ukrainska kvinnor, targeting the partnership anywhere between for every single theme, particularly the relationship within around three templates individually associated with the gendered double bind (review, complying, and you will problematic) while the misogynistic backlash you to observed.
Review so you can men
One of the subcategories recognized is contrasting regarding Dilma Rousseff so you can guys, each other evaluating Rousseff to help you male political leaders and you will outlining how some thing was other in the event that Rousseff have been men. Thus, i found that you will find one another a conceptual part and you may simple element of their unique research to guys. Inside the an abstract feel, we frequently spotted the word, “in the event that she have been a guy” to describe just how a posture would have played away in another way got Dilma not started a lady. This new story illustrated within our interviews is out-of a system that “likes guys” (Respondent 88, ), that have “zero unlock gender discrimination, although fact that [an excellent politician] is actually a man is a bonus” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever sharing this review significantly more concretely, there clearly was a watch Rousseff’s abrasive personality, the newest “tough lady around delicate guys.” The brand new estimate less than provides even more context:
Talks regarding Rousseff’s impeachment and the sexism and you will misogyny at the rear of brand new procedure was indeed discussed within the popular news (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you can Kaiser, 2016) and also in scholarly really works (Zdebskyi ainsi que al
Sure, and so they said that she was a hard person, one to she couldn’t correspond with anyone, one to she got a keen authoritarian way of talking. Exactly what for males appears as a praise “no, they are an arduous person, a personal-convinced person who knows what the guy wants.” To help you their unique try shown as the bad “no, she doesn’t know how to talk, she is tough, this woman is it” for the a terrible method. The way they talk to you, women. We have achieved a particular updates, we are being harsh, we’re deviating regarding so you’re able to how to become a woman, who’s nice, transparent, silent and such as for instance. The type of Dilma are ‘s the variety of women that have the ability to be strong contained in this a totally patriarchal business, facing so it buy you to can be found (Respondent 79, ).